Search for: "SMITH v. MCMAHON"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2015, 4:24 am
In 1999 Mr Smith and Ms Adamson agreed that the rights to the song should be split one-third to Mr Smith and two-thirds to Ms Adamson. [read post]
27 May 2015, 4:39 am
The case is called Minder Music Ltd and Julia Adamson v Steven Sharples, and involves a song entitled Touch Sensitive by the post punk band The Fall. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
NYPPL Comments: In New York State, unless otherwise provided by a collective bargaining agreement or by statute, typically only incompetence or misconduct related to job performance or off-duty misconduct adversely reflecting on the public employer [see, for example, Smith v Kerick, 292 A.D.2d 223 and Wilburn v McMahon, 296 A.D.2d 805] may serve as a lawful basis for an appointing authority initiating disciplinary action against a public officer or employee. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 8:54 pm
Smith v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
McMahon v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 8:46 am
In 2008, another judge of the federal district court, Colleen McMahon, had faced the same question in Gallo v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 7:04 pm
Here is the link to the 1999 11th Circuit Opinion detailing more of former Broward prosecutor Robert Carney's malfeasance;And here is a pertinent part of the decision copied from the Broward Blog: :Purvis v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 10:57 am
We discuss whether courts made the correct decision in such cases as Windsor v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am
" Judge McMahon says the 1940 case "might require her to rethink the ruling. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:48 am
From a legal standpoint, William McMahon, an attorney with Constangy Brooks and Smith, LLP writing in his firm's blog, Employee Benefits Unplugged, says ... the Court is promoting simplicity for administrators. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 11:48 am
From a legal standpoint, William McMahon, an attorney with Constangy Brooks and Smith, LLP writing in his firm's blog, Employee Benefits Unplugged, says ... the Court is promoting simplicity for administrators. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:57 pm
Coffee discussed dueling class actions and the ruling in Smith v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Fenner andamp;andnbsp; Smith, 906 F. 2d 1206, 121 14 (8th Cir. 1990); andnbsp;Biggans v. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
Smith reflected on the state of democracy and the rule of law in the Trump era. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
White Laboratories, Inc., 847 F.2d 355, 357-58 (7th Cir. 1988); McMahon v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 6:00 pm
McMahon (Internet Cases) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google – Google sued again for trade mark infringement in relation to AdWords program: Soaring Helmet v Leatherup.com (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Psystar – Psystar owes Apple $75,000 while Apple moves to lift stay in dispute over unauthorised Mac clones (Ars Technica) [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”[15] The court found that Third Circuit precedents, Hays and Co v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
- Amsterdam Court of Appeal rules in favour of Hachette Filipacchi Press, publisher of Elle magazine, in trade name/trade mark infringement litigation brought by clothing company WE Netherlands (Class 46) Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw: ALDO S and ALDI not similar (Class 46) South Africa More on the Springbok emblem (Afro-IP) Sweden Appeal Court rules on reproduction of album cover artwork in case against Åhléns (International… [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
Smith and Matthew S. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
Randy Smith accusing the panel's majority of writing new law saying "We have never held that an actress' performance could be copyrightable". [read post]
